Archive for the ‘politics’ category

Immigrants and Health care Costs

August 25th, 2011

Today’s I have just a short “ignorance removal post.” There are many misunderstandings out there, including many assumptions about  undocumented immigrants. Friends are often surprised when I explain, for example, that most “illegal immigrants” (not sure I like the title, since it is a civil infraction and not a criminal one to be here without papers), actually pay more in taxes than similar workers. This is because they get hired  using forged documents, pay all the usual taxes (including the largest, which is payroll taxes–and they never get to claim social security benefits), but they often do not claim the tax refunds that are due to them. Go to your state’s unclaimed money website and you can see this in the lists of unclaimed refund checks (look at the most common last names).

Another fallacy is that immigrants are a huge burden on our health care system. While this is a problem in some areas near the Mexican border, look at what Jason L. Riley reported in his book, Let Them In – The Case For Open Borders:

“A study done in 2006 by » Read more: Immigrants and Health care Costs

Against the Death Penalty

August 22nd, 2011

Why am I against the death penalty? For a variety of reasons, actually, but for this post I would like to point out one very important one. It is that when we have a death penalty, mistakes will be made and innocent people killed. The only practical way to avoid that is to not sentence people to death.

Consider this quote from Alexander Green’s book, The Secret of Shelter Island:

“In a 1989 study psychologist Deanna Kuhn found that when subjects were exposed to evidence inconsistent with a theory they preferred, they failed to notice it. When they did recognize the contradictory evidence, they simply reinterpreted in favor of their preconceived belief.

In a related study, scientific American » Read more: Against the Death Penalty

Republican Socialism

August 17th, 2011

What is Republican socialism, and are there Republican socialists in congress? It seems so at times, when you listen to what the Republicans themselves label as socialism and then look at what they vote for.  As reported in Reason Magazine and other news outlets, many Republicans favor keeping or expanding huge redistributionist programs. For example, in 2010 Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky), Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele, and former House Speaker  Newt Gingrich all released statements opposing any cuts to Medicare.

Republican president George Bush openly and repeatedly called for more redistribution of wealth by way of » Read more: Republican Socialism

Define Tax Increase

August 12th, 2011

How do you define a tax increase? It seems like a simple question, but as pointed out in a recent article on MoneyNews.com, it isn’t all that clear;

“In this semantic debate, members of Congress talk past each other without a common fiscal language. Defining a tax increase has become a central policy question as Congress and the Obama administration seek an agreement that can satisfy Republicans who oppose tax increases and Democrats who insist on them.”

The primary problem is whether to call the elimination of loopholes or deductions a tax increase. And what about tax credits? Does eliminating this or that payment to corporations and wealthy individuals for various purposes constitute a tax increase? Republicans almost universally say » Read more: Define Tax Increase

Public Funding of Religion?

August 10th, 2011

Most people are against public funding of religion, but should any public money go to religious organizations? On it’s face it seems unconstitutional, but proponents argue that as long as the money is used for social services to people in need it is acceptable. Thus the very secretive federal Office of Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships (OFBNP) doles out the cash, but with very little transparency, as reported in “Obama’s Religion Problem,” a recent article on alternet.com;

“Beneath its do-gooder exterior, the White House has taken few steps that have allayed the concerns of both advocates of church-state separation concerned about the OFBNP’s constitutionality and advocates of transparency and accountability. Meanwhile, as taxpayer dollars continue to be dispensed to faith-based organizations, it is still unclear how an executive order Obama signed in November 2010, which set out new requirements intended to reduce some constitutional concerns, will actually be » Read more: Public Funding of Religion?